Piotroski F-Score
5
00.00%
Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 GMT
Summary
- As of February 7, 2025, CDNS Piotroski F-Score is 5, with the most recent change of 0 (0.00%) on September 30, 2024.
- CDNS current Piotroski F-Score indicates the company has a moderate financial health.
Performance
CDNS Piotroski F-Score Chart
Add series to chart(max: 6)
company, ETF, index, featured screener or watchlist
Highlights
High & Low
Piotroski F-Score Formula
1 point for every condition that is met:- Net Income > 0
- Operating Cash Flow > 0
- Return On Assets > previous year
- Cash From Operations > Net Income
- Long-Term Debt/Total Assets < previous year
- Current Ratio > previous year
- Shares Outstanding have not increased
- Gross Margin > previous year
- Asset Turnover (Revenue / Assets) > previous year
- Net Income > 0
- Operating Cash Flow > 0
- Return On Assets > previous year
- Cash From Operations > Net Income
- Long-Term Debt/Total Assets < previous year
- Current Ratio > previous year
- Shares Outstanding have not increased
- Gross Margin > previous year
- Asset Turnover (Revenue / Assets) > previous year
CDNS Piotroski F-Score Trends
| PeriodPeriod | Piotroski F-ScorePiotroski F-Score | PricePrice | Market capMarket cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| todaytoday | 0.0% | +1.2% | +1.2% |
| 1 m1 month | - | +1.0% | +1.0% |
| 3 m3 months | 0.0% | +1.9% | +1.9% |
| 6 m6 months | - | +25.1% | +25.3% |
| ytdytd | - | +2.3% | +2.3% |
| 1 y1 year | -16.7% | +1.1% | +1.9% |
| 5 y5 years | -37.5% | +318.0% | +309.2% |
CDNS Piotroski F-Score Highs & Lows
| PeriodPeriod | HighHigh | Current vs highvs high | LowLow | Current vs lowvs low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 m | 1-month | ||||
| 3 m | 3-month | 5 | at high | 5 | at low |
| 6 m | 6-month | at high | at low | ||
| 1 y | 1-year | 7 | -28.6% | 5 | at low |
| 3 y | 3-year | 8 | -37.5% | 5 | at low |
| 5 y | 5-year | 8 | -37.5% | 5 | at low |
| alltime | all time | 9 | -44.4% | 2 | +150.0% |
Cadence Design Systems Piotroski F-Score History
| Date | Value |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 5(0.0%) |
| 2024 | 5(-16.7%) |
| 2024 | 6(-14.3%) |
| 2023 | 7(+16.7%) |
| 2023 | 6(0.0%) |
| 2023 | 6(0.0%) |
| 2023 | 6(0.0%) |
| 2022 | 6(-14.3%) |
| 2022 | 7(0.0%) |
| 2022 | 7(-12.5%) |
| 2022 | 8(0.0%) |
| 2021 | 8(0.0%) |
| 2021 | 8(+14.3%) |
| 2021 | 7(0.0%) |
| 2021 | 7(0.0%) |
| 2020 | 7(+40.0%) |
| 2020 | 5(0.0%) |
| 2020 | 5(-16.7%) |
| 2020 | 6(0.0%) |
| 2019 | 6(-25.0%) |
| 2019 | 8(0.0%) |
| 2019 | 8(+14.3%) |
| 2019 | 7(0.0%) |
| 2018 | 7(+40.0%) |
| 2018 | 5(-16.7%) |
| 2018 | 6(-14.3%) |
| 2018 | 7(-12.5%) |
| 2017 | 8(0.0%) |
| 2017 | 8(+14.3%) |
| 2017 | 7(0.0%) |
| 2017 | 7(+16.7%) |
| 2016 | 6(0.0%) |
| 2016 | 6(+20.0%) |
| 2016 | 5(-28.6%) |
| 2016 | 7(0.0%) |
| 2015 | 7(0.0%) |
| 2012 | 7(0.0%) |
| 2012 | 7(0.0%) |
| 2012 | 7(+16.7%) |
| 2011 | 6(0.0%) |
| 2011 | 6(0.0%) |
| 2011 | 6(-14.3%) |
| 2011 | 7(0.0%) |
| 2010 | 7(+16.7%) |
| 2010 | 6(0.0%) |
| 2010 | 6(+20.0%) |
| 2010 | 5(0.0%) |
| 2009 | 5(-16.7%) |
| 2009 | 6(+20.0%) |
| 2009 | 5(0.0%) |
| 2009 | 5(+25.0%) |
| 2008 | 4(+33.3%) |
| 2008 | 3(-50.0%) |
| 2008 | 6(0.0%) |
| 2008 | 6(0.0%) |
| 2007 | 6(-14.3%) |
| 2007 | 7(-12.5%) |
| 2007 | 8(0.0%) |
| 2007 | 8(0.0%) |
| 2006 | 8(+14.3%) |
| 2006 | 7(+16.7%) |
| 2006 | 6(0.0%) |
| Date | Value |
|---|---|
| 2006 | 6(0.0%) |
| 2005 | 6(-14.3%) |
| 2005 | 7(0.0%) |
| 2005 | 7(+16.7%) |
| 2005 | 6(+20.0%) |
| 2004 | 5(-28.6%) |
| 2004 | 7(+133.3%) |
| 2004 | 3(-40.0%) |
| 2004 | 5(0.0%) |
| 2003 | 5(0.0%) |
| 2003 | 5(0.0%) |
| 2003 | 5(+25.0%) |
| 2003 | 4(-20.0%) |
| 2002 | 5(-16.7%) |
| 2002 | 6(-14.3%) |
| 2002 | 7(0.0%) |
| 2002 | 7(-22.2%) |
| 2001 | 9(+28.6%) |
| 2001 | 7(-12.5%) |
| 2001 | 8(0.0%) |
| 2001 | 8(+33.3%) |
| 2000 | 6(+100.0%) |
| 2000 | 3(+50.0%) |
| 2000 | 2(-33.3%) |
| 2000 | 3(0.0%) |
| 1999 | 3(-40.0%) |
| 1999 | 5(+25.0%) |
| 1999 | 4(0.0%) |
| 1999 | 4(0.0%) |
| 1998 | 4(-42.9%) |
| 1998 | 7(+16.7%) |
| 1998 | 6(-14.3%) |
| 1998 | 7(+16.7%) |
| 1997 | 6(-14.3%) |
| 1997 | 7(0.0%) |
| 1997 | 7(+40.0%) |
| 1997 | 5(-37.5%) |
| 1996 | 8(+14.3%) |
| 1996 | 7(-12.5%) |
| 1996 | 8(0.0%) |
| 1996 | 8(0.0%) |
| 1995 | 8(+14.3%) |
| 1995 | 7(0.0%) |
| 1995 | 7(-12.5%) |
| 1995 | 8(+14.3%) |
| 1994 | 7(+16.7%) |
| 1994 | 6(0.0%) |
| 1994 | 6(+50.0%) |
| 1994 | 4(-20.0%) |
| 1993 | 5(-28.6%) |
| 1993 | 7(0.0%) |
| 1993 | 7(+40.0%) |
| 1993 | 5(0.0%) |
| 1992 | 5(0.0%) |
| 1992 | 5(+66.7%) |
| 1992 | 3(-25.0%) |
| 1992 | 4(-20.0%) |
| 1991 | 5(-16.7%) |
| 1991 | 6(0.0%) |
| 1991 | 6(-14.3%) |
| 1991 | 7(0.0%) |
| 1990 | 7(+40.0%) |
| 1990 | 5 |
FAQ
- What is Cadence Design Systems piotroski f-score?
- What is the all time high piotroski f-score for Cadence Design Systems?
- What is Cadence Design Systems piotroski f-score year-on-year change?
What is Cadence Design Systems piotroski f-score?
The current piotroski f-score of CDNS is 5
What is the all time high piotroski f-score for Cadence Design Systems?
Cadence Design Systems all-time high piotroski f-score is 9
What is Cadence Design Systems piotroski f-score year-on-year change?
Over the past year, CDNS piotroski f-score has changed by -1 (-16.67%)