QQJG ETF

These days, there's plenty of talk about disinformation and misinformation. Some of it may well be applicable to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing, which has taken a beating in the court of public opinion.

Harsh, often politically driven criticism of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing may have overstepped its bounds and likely won't have much long-term impact. That's the view of Chuka Umunna, JPMorgan's global head of sustainable solutions, who made comments to that effect at the Reuters Energy Transition conference in London.

Environmental, social, and governance funds, including exchange traded funds, took plenty of lumps in the court of public opinion and political circles. Those woes were compounded by the recent slump in technology stocks, which are staples in many ESG ETFs.

There is amount of criticism aimed at environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing. Given that, it's not a stretch to assume many infer the strategy and the related ETFs are falling by the wayside.

The human aspect of ESG investing is often overlooked in the midst of political and regulatory scrutiny. Many retail investors are drawn to ESG because it aligns with their personal beliefs and values.

ESG has faced criticism, but many investors still believe in its approach to allocating capital.

ESG investing has faced significant criticism in recent years, leading to outflows from related exchange traded funds in the past year.

Much has been made of the political criticism of ESG investing. That debate is often framed as a “war.

As environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing has evolved, so have asset allocators' and retail investors' demands. Those include more emphasis on social issues and risks.