Annual Payout Ratio
N/A
01 December 2023
Summary:
Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated annual payout ratio is not available.DBD Payout Ratio Chart
Add series to chart(max: 6)
company, ETF, index, featured screener or watchlist
TTM Payout Ratio
0.00%
0.00%0.00%
22 min ago
Summary:
Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated TTM payout ratio is currently 0.00%, unchanged on 07 January 2025. Over the past year, it has stayed the same.DBD TTM Payout Ratio Chart
Add series to chart(max: 6)
company, ETF, index, featured screener or watchlist
Quarterly Payout Ratio
N/A
01 September 2024
Summary:
Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated quarterly payout ratio is not available.DBD Quarterly Payout Ratio Chart
Add series to chart(max: 6)
company, ETF, index, featured screener or watchlist
DBD Payout Ratio Performance
| PeriodPeriod | AnnualAnnual | TTMTTM | QuarterlyQuarterly |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 y1 year | - | 0.0% | - |
| 3 y3 years | - | - | - |
| 5 y5 years | - | - | - |
DBD Payout Ratio High & Low
| PeriodPeriod | Annual vs highAnnual vs high | Annual vs lowAnnual vs low | TTM vs highTTM vs high | TTM vs lowTTM vs low | Quarter. vs highQuarter. vs high | Quarter. vs lowQuarter. vs low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 y | 3 years | at high | at low | ||||
| 5 y | 5 years | at high | at low | ||||
| alltime | all time | at high | at low |
Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated Payout Ratio History
| Date | Annual | TTM | Quarterly |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2025 | - | 0.00% | - |
| Dec 2018 | -1.45%(-88.6%) | - | 0.00%(0.0%) |
| Sept 2018 | - | - | 0.00%(0.0%) |
| June 2018 | - | - | 0.00%(-100.0%) |
| Mar 2018 | - | - | -10.52%(+56.8%) |
| Dec 2017 | -12.67%(-91.8%) | - | -6.71%(-68.2%) |
| Sept 2017 | - | - | -21.11%(-16.1%) |
| June 2017 | - | - | -25.16%(+94.6%) |
| Mar 2017 | - | - | -12.93%(+46.9%) |
| Dec 2016 | -155.29%(-251.4%) | - | -8.80%(-52.6%) |
| Sept 2016 | - | - | -18.57%(-79.6%) |
| June 2016 | - | - | -91.00%(-914.0%) |
| Mar 2016 | - | - | 11.18%(-80.9%) |
| Dec 2015 | 102.58%(+56.7%) | - | 58.59%(-32.0%) |
| Sept 2015 | - | - | 86.18%(+1.2%) |
| June 2015 | - | - | 85.14%(-112.6%) |
| Mar 2015 | - | - | -675.00%(-1179.3%) |
| Dec 2014 | 65.47%(-260.7%) | - | 62.54%(+10.1%) |
| Sept 2014 | - | - | 56.80%(+26.4%) |
| June 2014 | - | - | 44.95%(-76.4%) |
| Mar 2014 | - | - | 190.82%(-526.6%) |
| Dec 2013 | -40.75%(-141.2%) | - | -44.73%(-47.7%) |
| Sept 2013 | - | - | -85.52%(+385.6%) |
| June 2013 | - | - | -17.61%(-87.1%) |
| Mar 2013 | - | - | -136.98%(-11.0%) |
| Dec 2012 | 98.95%(+95.7%) | - | -153.96%(-236.8%) |
| Sept 2012 | - | - | 112.57%(+56.3%) |
| June 2012 | - | - | 72.04%(+79.8%) |
| Mar 2012 | - | - | 40.06%(+78.4%) |
| Dec 2011 | 50.57%(-114.2%) | - | 22.45%(-48.1%) |
| Sept 2011 | - | - | 43.24%(-51.2%) |
| June 2011 | - | - | 88.64%(-88.1%) |
| Mar 2011 | - | - | 745.70%(-5098.0%) |
| Dec 2010 | -355.03%(-233.0%) | - | -14.92%(-138.4%) |
| Sept 2010 | - | - | 38.85%(-35.8%) |
| June 2010 | - | - | 60.48%(-20.0%) |
| Mar 2010 | - | - | 75.64%(-95.2%) |
| Dec 2009 | 266.85%(+255.1%) | - | 1575.16%(-749.1%) |
| Sept 2009 | - | - | -242.68%(-525.2%) |
| June 2009 | - | - | 57.07%(-94.6%) |
| Mar 2009 | - | - | 1052.55%(-33.1%) |
| Dec 2008 | 75.14%(-52.4%) | - | 1573.35%(+4296.1%) |
| Sept 2008 | - | - | 35.79%(-41.7%) |
| June 2008 | - | - | 61.36%(-48.9%) |
| Mar 2008 | - | - | 120.13%(-177.4%) |
| Dec 2007 | 157.92%(+187.6%) | - | -155.29%(-379.5%) |
| Sept 2007 | - | - | 55.56%(-30.1%) |
| June 2007 | - | - | 79.43%(-130.3%) |
| Mar 2007 | - | - | -262.34%(-618.5%) |
| Dec 2006 | 54.91%(-2.9%) | - | 50.60%(+15.9%) |
| Sept 2006 | - | - | 43.64%(-36.3%) |
| June 2006 | - | - | 68.50%(-41.0%) |
| Mar 2006 | - | - | 116.09%(+29.2%) |
| Dec 2005 | 56.56%(+95.2%) | - | 89.87%(+72.4%) |
| Sept 2005 | - | - | 52.13%(+10.4%) |
| June 2005 | - | - | 47.24%(-10.2%) |
| Mar 2005 | - | - | 52.60%(+149.8%) |
| Dec 2004 | 28.97% | - | 21.06%(-20.0%) |
| Sept 2004 | - | - | 26.33%(-17.0%) |
| Date | Annual | TTM | Quarterly |
|---|---|---|---|
| June 2004 | - | - | 31.71%(-31.3%) |
| Mar 2004 | - | - | 46.19%(+108.5%) |
| Dec 2003 | 28.75%(-40.0%) | - | 22.15%(-10.6%) |
| Sept 2003 | - | - | 24.79%(-18.9%) |
| June 2003 | - | - | 30.58%(-35.5%) |
| Mar 2003 | - | - | 47.43%(-12.4%) |
| Dec 2002 | 47.93%(-30.0%) | - | 54.17%(+100.7%) |
| Sept 2002 | - | - | 26.99%(-52.7%) |
| June 2002 | - | - | 57.09%(+1360.1%) |
| Mar 2002 | - | - | 3.91%(-94.1%) |
| Dec 2001 | 68.43%(+111.7%) | - | 66.04%(-17.8%) |
| Sept 2001 | - | - | 80.36%(+95.0%) |
| June 2001 | - | - | 41.20%(-72.8%) |
| Mar 2001 | - | - | 151.50%(+377.5%) |
| Dec 2000 | 32.33%(-0.1%) | - | 31.73%(-0.0%) |
| Sept 2000 | - | - | 31.74%(+2.7%) |
| June 2000 | - | - | 30.90%(-12.5%) |
| Mar 2000 | - | - | 35.32%(+17.5%) |
| Dec 1999 | 32.35%(-36.2%) | - | 30.06%(-4.6%) |
| Sept 1999 | - | - | 31.50%(-4.3%) |
| June 1999 | - | - | 32.91%(-7.0%) |
| Mar 1999 | - | - | 35.40%(+26.5%) |
| Dec 1998 | 50.72%(+80.1%) | - | 27.99%(-15.2%) |
| Sept 1998 | - | - | 32.99%(-149.5%) |
| June 1998 | - | - | -66.67%(-284.9%) |
| Mar 1998 | - | - | 36.06%(+46.8%) |
| Dec 1997 | 28.16%(-12.1%) | - | 24.57%(-6.5%) |
| Sept 1997 | - | - | 26.28%(-6.2%) |
| June 1997 | - | - | 28.01%(-22.8%) |
| Mar 1997 | - | - | 36.29%(+31.7%) |
| Dec 1996 | 32.03%(-16.7%) | - | 27.56%(-5.6%) |
| Sept 1996 | - | - | 29.21%(-8.6%) |
| June 1996 | - | - | 31.97%(-26.2%) |
| Mar 1996 | - | - | 43.33%(+27.6%) |
| Dec 1995 | 38.45%(-8.6%) | - | 33.95%(-6.0%) |
| Sept 1995 | - | - | 36.10%(-6.5%) |
| June 1995 | - | - | 38.62%(-19.6%) |
| Mar 1995 | - | - | 48.03%(+28.3%) |
| Dec 1994 | 42.05%(-15.9%) | - | 37.43%(-6.7%) |
| Sept 1994 | - | - | 40.12%(-1.5%) |
| June 1994 | - | - | 40.74%(-22.8%) |
| Mar 1994 | - | - | 52.76%(+32.3%) |
| Dec 1993 | 50.00%(-48.4%) | - | 39.87%(-15.6%) |
| Sept 1993 | - | - | 47.24%(-8.6%) |
| June 1993 | - | - | 51.69%(-25.9%) |
| Mar 1993 | - | - | 69.77%(+71.4%) |
| Dec 1992 | 96.98%(+63.3%) | - | 40.71%(-20.0%) |
| Sept 1992 | - | - | 50.91%(-20.9%) |
| June 1992 | - | - | 64.37%(-219.5%) |
| Mar 1992 | - | - | -53.85%(-248.3%) |
| Dec 1991 | 59.38%(-18.7%) | - | 36.30%(-36.3%) |
| Sept 1991 | - | - | 56.99%(-29.0%) |
| June 1991 | - | - | 80.30%(-19.7%) |
| Mar 1991 | - | - | 100.00%(+86.0%) |
| Dec 1990 | 73.06%(+43.0%) | - | 53.76%(-75.9%) |
| Sept 1990 | - | - | 222.73%(+250.0%) |
| June 1990 | - | - | 63.64%(+0.6%) |
| Mar 1990 | - | - | 63.29% |
| Dec 1989 | 51.10% | - | - |
FAQ
- What is the all time high annual payout ratio for Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated?
- What is Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated TTM payout ratio?
- What is the all time high TTM payout ratio for Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated?
- What is DBD TTM payout ratio year-to-date change?
- What is Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated TTM payout ratio year-on-year change?
- What is the all time high quarterly payout ratio for Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated?
What is the all time high annual payout ratio for Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated?
Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated all-time high annual payout ratio is 266.85%
What is Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated TTM payout ratio?
The current TTM payout ratio of DBD is 0.00%
What is the all time high TTM payout ratio for Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated?
Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated all-time high TTM payout ratio is 0.00%
What is DBD TTM payout ratio year-to-date change?
Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated TTM payout ratio has changed by 0.00% (0.00%) since the beginning of the year
What is Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated TTM payout ratio year-on-year change?
Over the past year, DBD TTM payout ratio has changed by 0.00% (0.00%)
What is the all time high quarterly payout ratio for Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated?
Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated all-time high quarterly payout ratio is 1575.16%