Annual Payout Ratio
N/A
December 31, 2024
Summary
- CBL annual payout ratio is not available.
Performance
CBL Payout Ratio Chart
Add series to chart(max: 6)
company, ETF, index, featured screener or watchlist
High & Low
Earnings dates
TTM Payout Ratio
85.56%
0.00%0.00%
1 min ago
Summary
- As of February 26, 2025, CBL TTM payout ratio is 85.56%, unchanged on February 26, 2025.
- Over the past year, CBL TTM payout ratio has dropped by -796.79% (-90.30%).
- CBL TTM payout ratio is now -94.48% below its all-time high of 1550.00%.
Performance
CBL TTM Payout Ratio Chart
Add series to chart(max: 6)
company, ETF, index, featured screener or watchlist
Highlights
High & Low
Earnings dates
Quarterly Payout Ratio
N/A
December 31, 2024
Summary
- CBL quarterly payout ratio is not available.
Performance
CBL Quarterly Payout Ratio Chart
Add series to chart(max: 6)
company, ETF, index, featured screener or watchlist
High & Low
Earnings dates
Payout Ratio Formula
Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid
Net Income x 100%
Net Income x 100%
CBL Payout Ratio Trends
| PeriodPeriod | AnnualAnnual | TTMTTM | QuarterlyQuarterly |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 y1 year | - | -90.3% | - |
| 3 y3 years | - | +100.0% | - |
| 5 y5 years | - | - | - |
CBL Payout Ratio Highs & Lows
| PeriodPeriod | Annual vs highAnnual vs high | Annual vs lowAnnual vs low | TTM vs highTTM vs high | TTM vs lowTTM vs low | Quarter. vs highQuarter. vs high | Quarter. vs lowQuarter. vs low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 y | 3-year | -94.5% | +104.4% | ||||
| 5 y | 5-year | -94.5% | +104.4% | ||||
| alltime | all time | -94.5% | +104.4% |
CBL & Associates Properties Payout Ratio History
| Date | Annual | TTM | Quarterly |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2025 | - | 85.56%(-44.6%) | - |
| Sep 2024 | - | 154.41%(-9.3%) | 77.27%(-71.1%) |
| Jun 2024 | - | 170.33%(-88.8%) | 267.10%(-99.0%) |
| Mar 2024 | - | 1525.00%(+72.8%) | 25.74 K%(>+9900.0%) |
| Dec 2023 | 1804.05%(-7163.6%) | 882.35%(-145.1%) | 101.58%(+12.2%) |
| Sep 2023 | - | -1955.88%(+541.8%) | 90.56%(-256.5%) |
| Jun 2023 | - | -304.76%(+70.5%) | -57.85%(-101.6%) |
| Mar 2023 | - | -178.78%(+95.8%) | 3632.49%(+1233.4%) |
| Dec 2022 | -25.54%(<-9900.0%) | -91.33%(+495.4%) | 272.42%(-344.7%) |
| Sep 2022 | - | -15.34%(<-9900.0%) | -111.33%(<-9900.0%) |
| Jun 2022 | - | 0.00%(0.0%) | 0.00%(0.0%) |
| Mar 2022 | - | 0.00% | 0.00%(0.0%) |
| Sep 2021 | - | - | 0.00%(0.0%) |
| Dec 2020 | 0.00%(-100.0%) | - | 0.00%(0.0%) |
| Sep 2020 | - | - | 0.00%(-100.0%) |
| Dec 2019 | -54.82%(-76.4%) | - | - |
| Sep 2019 | - | - | -14.23%(-85.8%) |
| Jun 2019 | - | - | -100.23%(+61.6%) |
| Mar 2019 | - | - | -62.02%(-26.4%) |
| Dec 2018 | -232.54%(-224.3%) | - | -84.25%(-97.5%) |
| Sep 2018 | - | - | -3347.11%(+1640.8%) |
| Jun 2018 | - | - | -192.27%(-103.8%) |
| Mar 2018 | - | - | 5032.12%(+3144.0%) |
| Dec 2017 | 187.01%(+43.1%) | - | 155.12%(-75.4%) |
| Sep 2017 | - | - | 630.94%(+361.8%) |
| Jun 2017 | - | - | 136.64%(-17.5%) |
| Mar 2017 | - | - | 165.57%(+101.8%) |
| Dec 2016 | 130.64%(-40.1%) | - | 82.06%(-98.5%) |
| Sep 2016 | - | - | 5333.52%(+5841.3%) |
| Jun 2016 | - | - | 89.77%(-36.2%) |
| Mar 2016 | - | - | 140.75%(-155.5%) |
| Dec 2015 | 218.20%(+125.9%) | - | -253.42%(-268.8%) |
| Sep 2015 | - | - | 150.13%(+11.5%) |
| Jun 2015 | - | - | 134.63%(+10.3%) |
| Mar 2015 | - | - | 122.05%(+76.5%) |
| Dec 2014 | 96.60%(-58.1%) | - | 69.15%(-35.5%) |
| Sep 2014 | - | - | 107.29%(-23.1%) |
| Jun 2014 | - | - | 139.46%(+45.8%) |
| Mar 2014 | - | - | 95.64%(-83.2%) |
| Dec 2013 | 230.33%(+70.8%) | - | 568.83%(+288.1%) |
| Sep 2013 | - | - | 146.55%(-64.9%) |
| Jun 2013 | - | - | 417.39%(+170.9%) |
| Mar 2013 | - | - | 154.09%(+123.4%) |
| Dec 2012 | 134.86%(+9.2%) | - | 68.97%(-87.8%) |
| Sep 2012 | - | - | 563.28%(+282.4%) |
| Jun 2012 | - | - | 147.29%(-8.1%) |
| Mar 2012 | - | - | 160.27%(+218.5%) |
| Dec 2011 | 123.51%(-38.8%) | - | 50.32%(-120.2%) |
| Sep 2011 | - | - | -249.61%(-221.9%) |
| Jun 2011 | - | - | 204.85%(+141.3%) |
| Mar 2011 | - | - | 84.91%(-45.3%) |
| Dec 2010 | 201.77%(-138.6%) | - | - |
| Dec 2010 | - | - | 155.09%(-22.7%) |
| Sep 2010 | - | - | 200.54%(-93.8%) |
| Jun 2010 | - | - | 3222.31%(+4128.2%) |
| Mar 2010 | - | - | 76.21%(-422.9%) |
| Dec 2009 | -522.24% | - | -23.60%(-119.0%) |
| Sep 2009 | - | - | 124.26%(+10.4%) |
| Date | Annual | TTM | Quarterly |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2009 | - | - | 112.51%(-73.1%) |
| Mar 2009 | - | - | 418.91%(-146.3%) |
| Dec 2008 | 526.55%(+195.8%) | - | -904.54%(-305.3%) |
| Sep 2008 | - | - | 440.66%(+60.2%) |
| Jun 2008 | - | - | 275.09%(-23.0%) |
| Mar 2008 | - | - | 357.16%(+74.2%) |
| Dec 2007 | 178.03%(+36.3%) | - | 205.02%(+19.7%) |
| Sep 2007 | - | - | 171.25%(-4.6%) |
| Jun 2007 | - | - | 179.50%(+10.5%) |
| Mar 2007 | - | - | 162.44%(+68.8%) |
| Dec 2006 | 130.58%(+58.6%) | - | 96.23%(-43.1%) |
| Sep 2006 | - | - | 169.27%(+30.6%) |
| Jun 2006 | - | - | 129.62%(-12.7%) |
| Mar 2006 | - | - | 148.52%(+47.8%) |
| Dec 2005 | 82.31%(-46.2%) | - | 100.48%(+103.9%) |
| Sep 2005 | - | - | 49.27%(-57.8%) |
| Jun 2005 | - | - | 116.65%(+14.1%) |
| Mar 2005 | - | - | 102.22%(-64.9%) |
| Dec 2004 | 153.05%(+76.4%) | - | 291.51%(+163.2%) |
| Sep 2004 | - | - | 110.74%(+138.3%) |
| Jun 2004 | - | - | 46.47%(-60.7%) |
| Mar 2004 | - | - | 118.21%(-164.3%) |
| Dec 2003 | - | - | -183.75%(-158.3%) |
| Sep 2003 | - | - | 315.10%(+1234.6%) |
| Jun 2003 | - | - | 23.61%(-84.7%) |
| Mar 2003 | - | - | 153.85%(+82.4%) |
| Dec 2002 | 86.77%(-11.8%) | - | 84.35%(-11.5%) |
| Sep 2002 | - | - | 95.32%(+9.9%) |
| Jun 2002 | - | - | 86.77%(+8.1%) |
| Mar 2002 | - | - | 80.30%(-188.3%) |
| Dec 2001 | 98.37%(-0.5%) | - | -90.95%(-118.3%) |
| Sep 2001 | - | - | 497.93%(+353.8%) |
| Jun 2001 | - | - | 109.72%(+28.0%) |
| Mar 2001 | - | - | 85.74%(-133.7%) |
| Dec 2000 | - | - | -254.69%(-386.8%) |
| Sep 2000 | - | - | 88.79%(+5.6%) |
| Jun 2000 | - | - | 84.05%(-1.9%) |
| Mar 2000 | - | - | 85.71%(-24.3%) |
| Dec 1999 | 98.91%(-15.7%) | - | 113.27%(+18.3%) |
| Sep 1999 | - | - | 95.77%(+2.8%) |
| Jun 1999 | - | - | 93.15%(-2.6%) |
| Mar 1999 | - | - | 95.62%(-14.1%) |
| Dec 1998 | 117.29%(+0.6%) | - | 111.31%(-19.8%) |
| Sep 1998 | - | - | 138.71%(+12.7%) |
| Jun 1998 | - | - | 123.08%(+23.1%) |
| Mar 1998 | - | - | 100.00%(-4.7%) |
| Dec 1997 | 116.62%(+15.9%) | - | 104.90%(-19.8%) |
| Sep 1997 | - | - | 130.86%(-6.2%) |
| Jun 1997 | - | - | 139.47%(+41.0%) |
| Mar 1997 | - | - | 98.88%(+12.4%) |
| Dec 1996 | 100.58%(-27.6%) | - | 88.00%(-32.0%) |
| Sep 1996 | - | - | 129.41%(+62.1%) |
| Jun 1996 | - | - | 79.82%(-35.6%) |
| Mar 1996 | - | - | 123.88%(-10.4%) |
| Dec 1995 | 139.00%(+8.6%) | - | 138.33%(-3.6%) |
| Sep 1995 | - | - | 143.48%(+7.1%) |
| Jun 1995 | - | - | 134.00%(-2.7%) |
| Mar 1995 | - | - | 137.78% |
| Dec 1994 | 128.00% | - | - |
FAQ
- What is the all time high annual payout ratio for CBL & Associates Properties?
- What is CBL & Associates Properties TTM payout ratio?
- What is the all time high TTM payout ratio for CBL & Associates Properties?
- What is CBL TTM payout ratio year-to-date change?
- What is CBL & Associates Properties TTM payout ratio year-on-year change?
- What is the all time high quarterly payout ratio for CBL & Associates Properties?
What is the all time high annual payout ratio for CBL & Associates Properties?
CBL & Associates Properties all-time high annual payout ratio is 1804.05%
What is CBL & Associates Properties TTM payout ratio?
The current TTM payout ratio of CBL is 85.56%
What is the all time high TTM payout ratio for CBL & Associates Properties?
CBL & Associates Properties all-time high TTM payout ratio is 1550.00%
What is CBL TTM payout ratio year-to-date change?
CBL & Associates Properties TTM payout ratio has changed by 0.00% (0.00%) since the beginning of the year
What is CBL & Associates Properties TTM payout ratio year-on-year change?
Over the past year, CBL TTM payout ratio has changed by -796.79% (-90.30%)
What is the all time high quarterly payout ratio for CBL & Associates Properties?
CBL & Associates Properties all-time high quarterly payout ratio is 25.74 K%